Are Milleniums Faster? and if so why?
#1
Posted 10 May 2007 - 03:36 PM
Millenium
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/specs/data-d...spx?deriv=17994
Standard 1.7
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/specs/data-d...spx?deriv=13669
#2
Posted 10 May 2007 - 03:44 PM
Shouldnt think so unless Yellow is more aerodynamic!!
Maybe even slower because of the leather interior weighing more than cloth??
FORD PUMA THUNDER 2002 (SOLD)
HONDA CRZ 2013
#3
Posted 10 May 2007 - 03:47 PM
This post has been edited by Sex Kitten: 10 May 2007 - 08:04 PM
Reason for edit: no need to quote post above
#4
Posted 10 May 2007 - 03:47 PM
and it says the millenium (just checking the spelling ) is 1Kg heavier but faster accelleration with the same MPG, i havn't got a clue
#5
Posted 10 May 2007 - 04:00 PM
#6
Posted 10 May 2007 - 04:00 PM
#7
Posted 10 May 2007 - 04:15 PM
wereas the millenium edition was just made 99-2000
this means that parkers may be using a later 0-60 figure for the non-milly 1.7s, and as the torque limiter was upped the later on that pumas were made, the 0-60 went down.
so earlier pumas had a better 0-60, later pumas a slower 0-60 with more torque limiting.
might explain it?
maybe one day ill understand women ...... actually, on second thoughts.......
Glover - tells it how it is...there is only one opinion thats right, and its mine
#8
Posted 10 May 2007 - 04:17 PM
This post has been edited by Sex Kitten: 10 May 2007 - 08:05 PM
Reason for edit: no need to quote post above
#9
Posted 10 May 2007 - 07:55 PM
Besides, the figure I read of 8.7 is wrong as well........
It's actually around 8.4, but don't tell anyone, otherwise our insurance will go up!
Past projects to date, only for fun or auto masochism
1984 Ghia Escort 1.6 | 1989 Nova ... sorry | 1984 Corolla GTi | 1985 Corolla GT | 1988 Celica GT (162) | 1989 Honda Integra | 1990 Carina ... um | 1994 Honda Accord Coupe (US) 2.2 v-tec | 1998 FORD PUMA 1.7 | Next......something easier!
Set of 4 propeller wheels in fair condition with centre caps for sale.....no reasonable offer refused!
#11
Posted 10 May 2007 - 08:16 PM
The earlier Puma was marginally faster, the Milly is based on a earlier Puma.
the later Puma was slower as the torque limiter was raised affecting the time a wee bit.
Also the way the 0-60 was quoted changed. Origianlly it was 0-60 then to be eu compliant so to speak it became 0-62 as it was a KMPH adjusted figure hence it wnet up to 9.2 as well.
#12
Posted 10 May 2007 - 08:39 PM
Anyone know what a millenium is
This post has been edited by 101: 10 May 2007 - 08:42 PM
Chaos, panic, & disorder - My work here is done
HEAD ZINCHEAD OF THE YELLOW POSSE
Save A Tree, Eat Some Beaver
#13
Posted 10 May 2007 - 08:54 PM
Would the gauntlet still stand when the Milly's packing a 250BHP supercharged K20
#14
Posted 10 May 2007 - 08:55 PM
#15
Posted 10 May 2007 - 08:56 PM
#16
Posted 25 June 2007 - 05:53 PM
I just changed the nearside headlight and thought it was such a polava that I should probably change car, after finding that my car is actually a few seconds slower 0-60 than I had previously believed I am almost certainly going to do it. I should be able to trade up to a nice Y-reg Impreza. Hmm, something to think about.
#17
Posted 25 June 2007 - 05:58 PM
If you don't like fixing things why are you thinking of buying an old Impreza Blub blub blub blub bang
#18
Posted 25 June 2007 - 06:10 PM
Then again, I can't get the sodding spare wheel out so I can't talk!
This post has been edited by southpaw: 25 June 2007 - 06:11 PM
#19
Posted 25 June 2007 - 07:59 PM
Let me guess.. you tried to use the plastic screwdriver-lookalike-thing on the jack to lower the spare wheel cage?
They should mount a small camera in the boot that activates when you try to get the spare out. Would make awesome television. Shame i'd be on it as well though ...
Melina blue 1.7 (11-1997)
Honda VTR 1000 SP-2 (2004)
#20
Posted 25 June 2007 - 08:16 PM