Coilovers Vs. Ford (eibach) Suspension ride quality
#1
Posted 06 December 2008 - 08:35 AM
I need to replace my tired shocks and want to go lower by 30mm. (I'm running standard size wheels/tyres and Polyflex bushes all around). I've worked out that if I go for Ford shocks and Eibach lowering springs, then I'm looking at ~£320. Alternatively, there's a nice set of AP coilovers on Pumaspeed for £350.
Question is: what's the ride like on coilovers vs. the Ford kit? I'm after less body roll, but don't want to be hammered and rattled into a pulp! Any advice appreciated.
Cheers, Billy
#2
Posted 06 December 2008 - 10:15 AM
It all depends on the setup of the coilovers- spring rate and damping which for that price I assume will be fixed. Basically the shorter the spring travel, the higher the spring rate=stiffness in order to avoid the car bottoming out on bumps.
I would suggest maybe riding in a Puma fitted with the AP setup (also worth asking if it's poly bushed as this also makes a noticeable difference) and the Eibach setup...your perception of 'hard' is VERY subjective so only you can really be the judge.
I have been in a couple of Pumas with Eibach springs and they are a good compromise in terms of price but the coilovers give better suspension control and will no doubt give a firmer ride (but read above with regards to your perception of 'hard').
Another factor is the state of the roads you use, if they're smooth then a harder ride has less effect on you...
#3
Posted 06 December 2008 - 10:46 AM
Those AP Coilovers are available for little over £300 if you shop around, but the damper element is non-adjustable, and in reality, just how useful is an adjustable ride height? Surely you should get your alignment checked whenever you alter it, which would be something of a pain?
Just out of interest, how did you arrive at £320 for the Ford / Eibach kit?
2000 Ford Focus 1.6i Ghia
2006 Renault Clio 2.0i RenaultSport 197 - SOLD
2005 Honda CR-V 2.0i Executive auto
2001 Ford Puma 1.7i Black
#4
Posted 06 December 2008 - 11:33 AM
Adjustable ride height is for aesthetic and functional reasons as in the process of lowering you are effectively shortening the spring travel and making the ride stiffer. The alignment will be affected when lowering even by 30mm as with most lowering springs but once that is set, playing with adjustments on adjustable coilovers of maybe 5-10 mm isn't going to drastically affect alignmnent- I've probably lowered mine some 20-30mm more than when the alignment was first set for my coilovers and had it retested and it's still within tolerance, the tolerances for a road car obviously being a lot less precise than for a race setup.
*not to be confused with track handling.
#5
Posted 06 December 2008 - 12:47 PM
I guess the question then is how the AP's compare with the more expensive Weitecs.
2000 Ford Focus 1.6i Ghia
2006 Renault Clio 2.0i RenaultSport 197 - SOLD
2005 Honda CR-V 2.0i Executive auto
2001 Ford Puma 1.7i Black
#6
Posted 06 December 2008 - 09:09 PM
£320 came from Ford quoting £48 each for shocks, and i've seen the Eibach springs for £120-130. So total of £320-330. Not sure if the £48 was inc. VAT. So the AP Coilovers from Pumaspeed at £350 are therefore a similar price in my book.
Just had a PM from YOG, and will try and come along to the surrey/berkshire meet to talk about it some more - though I'm moving house on Monday, so it's going to be really busy. Nice double garage where I'm going though, so that'll make mods a bit easier!
#7
Posted 18 January 2009 - 08:34 PM
The ride height is easily adjustable and allows you to get it just right - no need to remove wheels once fitted, simply work out how much lower/higher you want to go, jack it up on one side to reveal a big enough gap above the wheels to get your arms through, unscrew the grubscrew on the strut, and then twist the upper strut in either direction. Then retighten the grubscrew and lower the car to the ground.
And the big question: the ride quality? It's good - surprisingly good. Not harsh; only slightly firmer than than the original supension, but really comfortable compared to my worn shocks, which were bouncing the car a lot; it gives a more controlled ride, though it does not seem particularly wearing to me. Over broken surfaces (e.g. rough stone farm track), it is actually smoother. And the road noise levels seem to be very slightly reduced, though they were never that bad (the Toyo T1-R on original alloys + Powerflex bushes is really not much different from the original parts in my opinion, though there's lots of doom and gloom written about Powerflex and roadnoise - never understood why). So AP seem to have done a great job in matching spring and damper.
Adjusted the headlight height ~1-hour ago (surprisingly, had hardly moved) and will get it re-tracked tomorrow. I'll keep an eye on tyre wear on the inner edges. Think I'm running at ~35mm below original - looks terrific, and I'm not into that slammed look, but yet one more mod successfully completed! Just looking forward to that high speed section over Chobham Common tomorrow morning now...
#8
Posted 19 January 2009 - 06:22 AM
Zorro
#9
Posted 19 January 2009 - 09:16 AM
Zorro
Thanks Zorro! I figured that the rubber components in the top mounts, which don't come as part of the coilover kit, would be pretty worn after 78k miles, so I replaced them for peace of mind. On inspection, there was definitely a height difference between new and old top mount rubber isolators - the old ones had compressed ~5-10mm, which is hardly surprising after 78k. I bought the fixing bolts because I was concerned I might knacker the original rusted ones on removal, though this was not an issue in the end. And the front top mount 'bearing' was recommended by Ford when I ordered the other parts. I cannot recall the part numbers - I'll have to dig out the receipt, but the Ford parts counter total was £85, so not an insignificant sum, but makes the fitting job a good one. There was no problem ordering the parts - there are very few components in the top mount itself.
After doing a 25 mile run to work this morning, the setup is definitely 'jigglier' at slow speed than the original - seems to be particularly noticeable at speeds under 30mph, e.g. when crawling in traffic. However, higher speeds are more controlled and you realise you are simply carrying more speed generally. Also handles speed ramps and potholes very well - none of that bucking and yawing over speed ramps anymore or bottoming out 'crash' as it goes down a hole ! And I'm sure it's slightly quieter re. road noise than the original. Might experiment with slightly higher tyre pressures again - currently on 30psi front and 29psi rear. Not sure if a change in tyre from Toyo T1-R to Michelin Pilot Sport Exalto 2 might also make an improvement to the jigglyness...
Only one suggestion if you are fitting the same kit - the rear suspension top mount nut is tricky to reach with a spanner, particularly when you are locking the top of the piston with another spanner or mole grips, underneath that side section of the rear parcel shelf. Part of the reason it is tricky is that the top mount steel cup is recessed - the nut sits in the recess, which obstructs access to the nut. So I put a couple of conventional fat washers underneath the nut (on the top surface of the mounting cup), to raise it up, giving better spanner access. There is plenty of thread on the top of the piston for fixing, so this is a safe option.
Be interested to know anyone else's opinion on these AP Coilovers - I think they're good value for money.
Billy
#10
Posted 19 January 2009 - 05:32 PM
Zorro
#11
Posted 19 January 2009 - 08:34 PM
My signature = loads of cash. To be honest, would I have spent £130/month since 2005, to get it where it is today? Difficult to answer that question! The 130 includes all the servicing and parts fitted, but not the stereo. It's a very rewarding car to drive and I own the car outright. + I love working on it to get it just right, so would a £200/month car loan for a 2-year old GTi of some description, give me as much satisfaction? not so sure. Anyway - it's purely a philosophical question, because the money is well and truly spent now!! Your choice Zorro...
#12
Posted 19 January 2009 - 08:47 PM
F1002513 front top strut bearing £4.94 each
F1475989 lower strut bolts (think they are rears) £0.99 each
F1473444 lower strut bolts (fronts?) £1.16 each
F1039001 Top mount rubber isolator (rear?) £14.80 each
F1023587 Top mount rubber pad (front?) £15.06 each
add VAT and you're at ~£84
This post has been edited by billy: 19 January 2009 - 08:55 PM
#13
Posted 19 January 2009 - 08:49 PM
I replaced all four top mounts too, and although the old ones didn't look bad, this has cured a knock from the back end.
My parts were about £380 in total, including top mounts, Eibachs and four dampers, plus £30 to the nice chap who helped me fit them.
Not entirely sure about the ride quality, definately feels tighter, but I haven't really had chance to try it on any twisties yet. Just lousy suburban tarmac where it seems marginally better than it was. Definately no worse though.
2000 Ford Focus 1.6i Ghia
2006 Renault Clio 2.0i RenaultSport 197 - SOLD
2005 Honda CR-V 2.0i Executive auto
2001 Ford Puma 1.7i Black
#14
Posted 19 January 2009 - 08:54 PM
#15
Posted 19 January 2009 - 08:59 PM
Zorro.
#16
Posted 19 January 2009 - 09:07 PM
My next mod is the FRP exhaust, manifold and airbox mod, I think then our cars will have a lot in common.
I am running 16's with 300mm brakes, Goodrich hoses, powerflex rear beam and FRP front bushes, 20mm hub spacers, and soon 15mm front spacers, but I don't have any uprated ECU and only have a standard panel filter.
Did you get the map done after the exhaust, or at the same time?
2000 Ford Focus 1.6i Ghia
2006 Renault Clio 2.0i RenaultSport 197 - SOLD
2005 Honda CR-V 2.0i Executive auto
2001 Ford Puma 1.7i Black
#17
Posted 19 January 2009 - 10:28 PM
Remap via the flash tuner (Pumabuild's own map recommended by them) was done after the exhaust - I did it because I was disappointed with the mismatch in power to noise from the exhaust! the midrange torque seemed to drop off. The remap seemed to bring the power and torque back again and suits the higher air flow through the engine. And the fuel economy hardly suffered after the remap - perhaps 4% more fuel max.
#19
Posted 26 January 2009 - 07:51 PM
Here you go - about 40mm - note the rear is still higher, just like the original set-up - it really helps turn-in on corners. Rear view is nicely chunky now (also fitted 12.5mm rear hub spacers).
#20
Posted 20 February 2009 - 08:55 PM